Posted Feb 06, 2017 by Michael L. Brown

Dear Mr. President and Mr. Vice-President,

I write this letter as a supporter and advocate, not a critic or adversary, as someone who voted for you and who regularly calls on millions of Americans to pray for you. I also write this with the understanding that you have been elected to serve the American people as a whole and not just one particular faction of Americans.

The great challenge, however, is one that you must deal with on a daily basis: When you stand up for what you believe is right – be it securing our borders or nominating a solid pro-life justice to the Supreme Court – you will alienate a certain number of Americans who oppose your policies and choices. That is inevitable, although regrettable, but if there is any political leader on the planet who is more concerned with acting on convictions than with pleasing people, it is you.

And this brings me to the heart of this appeal.

While you have consistently positioned yourself as a friend of the LGBT community during your campaigning, having Peter Thiel speak at the Republican National Convention and holding up a “LGBT’s for Trump” flag at one of your rallies, you have never positioned yourself as a champion of gay and transgender rights.

Conversely, you have most certainly positioned yourself as a champion of religious freedom, and you know that without the vote of conservative Christians (with whom I identify), you could not have gained the presidency. In that respect, we are a unique and important part of your constituency and some of your strongest supporters.

In your first weeks in office, we have been tremendously heartened by some key choices you have made, and we were encouraged by the forcefulness of your speech at the National Prayer Breakfast. It is clear that our religious liberties are very important to you, and they should be, since they are at the very foundation of our nation.

We were also encouraged to hear that you were considering legislation that would have protected religious groups from the negative effects of one of President Obama’s executive orders, namely, the order that put sexual orientation and gender identity on a par with skin color and ethnicity, as if gay was the new black or as if a man identifying as a woman was the same as him being Asian or Hispanic.

As it turns out, you signed a bill saying that you would uphold Mr. Obama’s pro-LGBT activism, meaning, that while standing strongly for religious liberty you are unintentionally undercutting that very same liberty.

Mr. President, I truly believe that you desire to stand with LGBT Americans and you do not want to see them hurt or attacked by others, and I second your sentiments wholeheartedly. At the same time, the legislation you signed will potentially punish conservative Christians and others for simply living out their faith. Not only so, but I believe you will soon learn that there is no appeasing LGBT activists and that as long as you demonstrate loyalty to your conservative Christian base, you will be considered their enemy.

To make matters worse – and here I turn my appeal to Mr. Pence – when the vice president recently appeared on ABC News with George Stephanopoulos, discussing this very issue, Mr. Pence responded to a pointed question about this executive order by stating that “throughout the campaign, President Trump made it clear that discrimination would have no place in our administration.” He added, “I think the generosity of his spirit, recognizing that in the patriot's heart, there's no room for prejudice is part of who this president is.”

Mr. Vice President, I know you are a committed Christian yourself, but may I ask if you are saying that it is prejudiced and discriminatory for someone to believe that it’s best for a child to have a mother and father (rather than two fathers or two mothers)?  That it is prejudiced and discriminatory to believe that marriage is the union of a man and a woman (and therefore not the union of two men or two women)? That it is prejudiced and discriminatory to believe that a 15-year-old boy who believes he is a girl should not be allowed to play on the girls’ sports teams or share their locker rooms and shower stalls?

Last year in England, a 42-year-old Christian evangelist was handing out gospel pamphlets on the street when a 19-year-old gay teen asked him what his God said about homosexuality. The preacher quoted Genesis to him, explaining that God made Adam and Eve to reproduce and have children.

Subsequently, the preacher was arrested and held in custody overnight and “accused of threatening or abusive behaviour ‘aggravated by prejudice relating to sexual orientation’ - despite not swearing or using any form of offensive language.”

Vice President Pence, with all due honor, I ask you: Do you see how your choice of words reinforces the same mentality that led to the arrest of this Christian evangelist, specifically, that his actions were allegedly “aggravated by prejudice relating to sexual orientation”?

And President Trump, with the utmost respect, I ask you: Do you see how the executive order you signed is a step in the wrong direction, a direction that ultimately leads to discrimination against Christians?

I’m quite aware, Mr. President, that the case in England is different than the federal legislation that you signed, but having monitored the trajectory of LGBT activism for more than a decade, I can assure you that you will not win the widespread support of the LGBT community until you distance yourself from the evangelical Christians who helped elect you and who gave you wise counsel throughout your campaign. In other words, you will not be viewed as a real friend of the LGBT community until you side with gay activism at the cost of Christian liberties.

May I ask you to give these matters your prayerful consideration, inviting some of your most trusted spiritual advisors for input as well? And may I ask you, at the least, to go ahead and write the executive order we were expecting, namely the one enshrining our religious liberties?

If you put religious liberties first, it will be for the good of the nation as a whole.

If you side against these precious liberties, it will hurt the nation as a whole.

May God Himself give you wisdom.

You have my prayerful support.

Sign Up or Login to post comments.


Royce posted a comment · Feb 10, 2017
Good letter Dr. Brown. I would say I wholeheartedly agree but I didn't vote for Trump so can't go with you there. Here's the crux of the matter and the major problem with Trump/Pence statement and Clinton's opening the door for BHO. The 1964 CRA made it illegal to discriminate on Inherent, unchangeable characteristics and NOT BEHAVIORS!! One does not CHOOSE or change their Race, Color, Sex, or National Origin. Religion is redundant and didn't need to be included because it is already protected under the 1st Amendment. Nixon's 1969 addition of "handicap and age” fall in the same category as unchangeable, innate. The change occurred when Clinton opened the door, just as he did with his DADT for the Military, with his addition of "sexual orientation". There is NO proof/evidence whatsoever that "sexual-orientation" even exists whereas physical evidence provides all the proof necessary in the other instances. However, even if sexual-orientation were to be proven to exist, that would NOT change the fact that one still CHOOSES to engage in same-sex BEHAVIOR. Moreover, it has been proven that sexual-orientation in itself can change and HAS. Now BHO & Trump have taken it one step further to include how one CHOOSES to BEHAVE in public place and workcenter by they way they dress and ACT. There is NO justification for this whatsoever except for purely caving the the PC Left. Trump/Pence say they have no room for prejudice in their heart. Well, that's just baloney. They DO. Only their prejudice is against anyone with a conscience and the God-given common-sense that comes with it. When a man or woman exhibits a BEHAVIOR such as acting or dressing in a manner that is harmful to one's business, the owners of that business have every right to fire him. It is a travesty to compare IMMORAL BEHAVIOR with one's skin color or national origin or race or sex. And to make such IMMORAL BEHAVIOR a protected class is IMMORAL BEHAVIOR itself and sinful discrimination/prejudice against the MORAL one's. Now, that said, get ready for a whole new class of lawsuits. It won't be long before transgenders start filing Unlawful Termination lawsuits because some dude in a dress hit on some guy at work and the guy complained to HR he was being sexually harassed. The transgender will say it's a false lawsuit and he's being harassed because he's transgender. Or a woman dressed as a man hits on another woman. Or a man dressed as a woman hits on a woman and claims he's a lesbian transgender. Pandora's Box has been opened-wide and the hornet's nest inside stirred well. I would add that I'm a 20yr USN-Ret Vet so I know well what it means to support your superiors, especially when they may hold a position that is not popular or even against your own. BUT, Pence would do well to remember Matt. 10 when he defends Trump. The Fed'l Trans Policy is sin. Pence should remember Romans 13 & what the Government is there for. It should be used as an arm for God!! Not to promote Sin. Fed'l Trans Policy is Sin. Just like in the Military where we obeyed all LAWFUL orders and had the duty to disobey Unlawful orders, Pence would be well-advised to remember Who he takes His primary marching orders from!