Andie posted a comment · Jan 16, 2017
I bought the book, read it halfway. Dr. Michael did carefuly when quoting others, and before the subject brought into writing, he did contact them first, if they really stood for what they said, and to make sure he wrote accurately, and if they really meant that way. But John Crowded made a response without reading the book i presume, so i can't say John reacted correctly about the book. And I also have the book af grace revolution of Joseph Prince, so i think I got enough comparation about Dr. Michael statements and my own. Its not divisive action to bring people into the truth. God Him self being divisive to us, devising wheats and tares. The lambs and the goats. Rather than divisive, its actually re-uniting people to Him, returning the lost ones. Repairing the damages made by the errors of this called "grace-movement".
Ejubilee posted a comment · Dec 03, 2016
It seems it is the fruit of your effort to box and divide some brothers and siters as hyper-grace. I am not sure it is sinful, but I see the book is divisive. My suggestion is to teach without making divisive suggestion. Your intention could be used by anyone to the extreem.